The Natal chart reveal everything?

A student of astrology of Kepler made me a question recently:

"Do the natal chart reveals everything that happens to a person?" "Why or why not?"

This was my somewhat improvised response:

My first impression on this issue it seems that although it seems very specific, there is no way that is somewhat ambiguous. It is the question whether or not the chart of a person is capable of revealing details about the life of a person, or is the underlying emphasis to the question if or astrology in general not disclose all the details about a person's life? This is important, I think, because there are a lot of other lists that one finds in the course of his life as well as the Astral.

There are synastry and composite graphics that describe the nature and the course of the relationship between people and things. There are graphics inceptional to first meetings for important events, the foundation of buildings and cities, to even for the purchase and sale of goods. There are mundane for large groups of people, or graphic graphics horary questions simply unique and specific.

Almost everything has a graphic. When you realize and start to pay attention to some of the other lists, you begin to see how they tend to line one with the other in weird ways and sort of echo the same. There are certain level where I think the conscience of all the lists of the life of a person in the final analysis, would reveal everything what was going to happen to a person, although it is not humanly possible to take each graphic a person never interact with account.

Therefore, what we have, then, seems mainly the natal chart, although it is the graphic that is most relevant and revealing when it comes to life, difficult to say could you explain everything by itself. Although rare on the chart is indicating simply not important events in a person's life. In additional indicating all the important events, which I believe it can be done and is also surprising how that may indicate events relatively minor, as well. As brief emotional States with temporary transit of the Moon, or get a minor cut or burn when Marte hit a half point, or have problems of equipment under a brief transit of mercury. There are all these techniques and subdivisions that can be applied to the chart that seem to show different perspectives or shadows of the life of the native, with different levels of detail. In a way it is only the fact that we can not take into account all these different factors and measurements minutes that prevents us from knowing all of the main and secondary events in a person's life.

This leads to the final and perhaps the more important than all of this is underlying, that is what is within the capacity of the astrologer to do. Can the natal chart reveal everything that happens to a person? Yes, probably.  Is it possible that the astrologer know and process all the factors involved in the graphic of a person for the duration of his life? No.

It's a large part of which requires the withdrawal in the underlying multivalence of symbolism and find ways to move, focusing on the wider archetype or formal meaning that surround a certain locations or symbolism. The school of thought dominant in modern Astrology probably better articulated in the work of Richard Tarnas, today, is that the underlying multivalence symbolism is what allows some flexibility and essentially free - will. If things are only widely "determined archetypally" or "predictive archetypally," as Tarnas says, there is space for people to perhaps choose what specific manifestation of the archetype will occur in your life through some kind of conscious or deliberate decision.

View the Original article